跳转至内容
  • 版块
  • 最新
  • 标签
  • 热门
  • 世界
  • 用户
  • 群组
皮肤
  • 浅色
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • 深色
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • 默认(不使用皮肤)
  • 不使用皮肤
折叠
AI订阅指南

AI订阅指南

  1. 主页
  2. 资源与教程
  3. When Judgment Becomes the Bottleneck

When Judgment Becomes the Bottleneck

已定时 置顶 已锁定 已移动 资源与教程
15 评论 11 发布者 448 浏览 2 关注中
  • 从旧到新
  • 从新到旧
  • 最多赞同
回复
  • 在新帖中回复
登录后回复
此主题已被删除。只有拥有主题管理权限的用户可以查看。
  • 星 离线
    星 离线
    星河忘机
    编写于 最后由 编辑
    #1

    来源:https://dev.to/gamya_m/when-judgment-becomes-the-bottleneck-973


    Someone left a comment that's been rattling around in my head: "We're moving from an era where implementation was the bottleneck to one where judgment becomes the bottleneck. When anyone can generate code, interfaces, and integrations in minutes, the differentiator becomes identifying worthwhile problems, defining clear requirements, and recognizing whether the result is actually good."

    Think about what it took to build something even three or four years ago. You'd need someone who knows frontend, someone who knows how to call an image generation API, someone who knows how to call a language model API, someone who knows how to wire those together, someone who knows how to deploy it. That's a team. I described what I wanted in a paragraph. The implementation step — all of the above — happened in minutes.

    If the hard part used to be "can we build this," and that part is now fast, what's the hard part now? Identifying worthwhile problems. Defining clear requirements. Recognizing whether the result is good.

    Here's the thing I keep circling back to: judgment isn't something you can prompt your way into. You can ask an AI to "review this code for bugs" or "tell me if this design is good," and it'll give you an opinion. But knowing whether that opinion is trustworthy — knowing enough to push back — that still requires you to understand the problem space yourself.

    The easier it gets to generate things, the more it seems to matter that you actually understand what you're generating and why. I'm less worried about "will AI make skills obsolete" and more curious about "which skills are becoming more valuable because of this shift" — and judgment, evaluation, and knowing what questions to ask seem to be high on that list.

    (此帖无评论)


    1 条回复 最后回复
    3
    • 蒲 离线
      蒲 离线
      蒲公英海角
      编写于 最后由 编辑
      #2

      有没有视频版本?文字版有些地方不太直观。

      1 条回复 最后回复
      1
      • 花 离线
        花 离线
        花影长安
        编写于 最后由 编辑
        #3

        太有用了,正好在找这方面的资料,收藏了慢慢消化。

        1 条回复 最后回复
        1
        • 落 离线
          落 离线
          落樱归途
          编写于 最后由 编辑
          #4

          太有用了,正好在找这方面的资料,收藏了慢慢消化。

          1 条回复 最后回复
          0
          • 欠 离线
            欠 离线
            欠吻
            编写于 最后由 编辑
            #5

            这个教程的第二步可以用更简单的方式实现,回头发个补充帖。

            1 条回复 最后回复
            1

            你好!看起来您对这段对话很感兴趣,但您还没有一个账号。

            厌倦了每次访问都刷到同样的帖子?您注册账号后,您每次返回时都能精准定位到您上次浏览的位置,并可选择接收新回复通知(通过邮件或推送通知)。您还能收藏书签、为帖子顶,向社区成员表达您的欣赏。

            有了你的建议,这篇帖子会更精彩哦 💗

            注册 登录
            回复
            • 在新帖中回复
            登录后回复
            • 从旧到新
            • 从新到旧
            • 最多赞同


            • 登录

            • 没有帐号? 注册

            • 登录或注册以进行搜索。
            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
            • 第一个帖子
              最后一个帖子
            0
            • 版块
            • 最新
            • 标签
            • 热门
            • 世界
            • 用户
            • 群组